As soon as Trump came on the
scene I vowed not to blog on him and the more writings and television spots I
saw about him the more determined I became. The longer this has gone on the
more I have realized I have nothing unique to contribute so why bother everyone
with the same rhetoric?
My change of heart has come
because I have realized not voicing my opinions is damaging me physically and
emotionally so I am going to write and you, as an American, are free to read or
not to read. Hopefully I have contributed something different than everyone else
and if not I may at least save myself from an aneurism.
This will involve a couple
of things. Foremost on my mind, though not the most important issue is how
perplexed I am at the American people. I will be addressing Trump supporters directly
here. How can so many of you be enamored with a badly coiffed snake oil
salesman? I have no doubt Trump is an intelligent man, but that doesn’t mean he
is sane as well. He is obviously manipulative, and has the coldhearted attitude
about business that has made American millionaires throughout history “great”
by stepping on the backs of others. I do not dare quote here unless I am
certain of who said what so I will point out when I do not know .
Having said that, at one
point Clinton was talking about how many contractors have complained Trump
never paid them. Trump (who was interrupting) was saying things like “well
maybe I didn’t like their work” with Clinton replying “Shouldn’t they be paid
for their materials and labor” and I believe this is where Trump said “no it’s
called good business”. Wow. Even if I did not get the exact quote correct, he
did say that. When Clinton stated that Trump had not paid taxes and that could
be one reason he would not show his tax returns, he boasted,” That is called
being smart”. So, at times we do get some insight into who this man really is through his boastfulness. He is so in love
with himself that he sees his humanitarian shortcomings as something to be
proud of.
I do not understand why you
(Trump supporters) let him get away with non-answers. When repeatedly asked for
his tax return he keeps saying his attorney says not to show it until after the
audit and yet each time the person asking for it tells him that is incorrect,
he can show them anytime. H* just ignores the whole thing. Are you not
suspicious of this?
How did he earn such blind
faith? We know he has been in bankruptcy what, 4? 6 times? His answer to that? He was taking advantage of
existing laws and if we do not like it we need to change the laws. So there is
no morality mixed with his decisions; if
it’s legal it’s okay.
Why are you, Trump
supporters, not more concerned about his temperament? He has made it obvious he
cannot let even a small slight go unpunished, he cannot keep his intelligence
when he loses his cool ( I am waiting for him to use the old “I am rubber you
are glue” bit). Do his followers see
this as strength of character? Do they not see the danger in this when dealing
with domestic issues he doesn’t agree with but must deal with, or foreign
dignitaries who are straight up assholes? This man was only able to stay
composed for the first 10 minutes of a 90 minute debate and then shouted,
interrupted, went way, way over time, ignored the rules and the moderator - basically
took over the room. That sounds great when you need a best friend to protect
you from the school bully, but as the leader of the most influential nation on
earth, can we afford that kind of rigidity? Do we want the bully running the
school? His “small loan” from his father was a million dollars. This shows his
perception of what a dollar is worth, or he is a liar. Actually, he IS a huge
liar and when fact - checked you
followers just call it some kind of conspiracy against him. Is this a campaign
or a religion? One of my biggest questions is this; when you agree with Trump’s
slogan “makeAmerica great again” what EXACTLY do you mean? Define “great” and
then tell me when this “great” of yours was. I want specifics because he will
have to come up with them. And if you can do it without being a racist or
sexist or homophobe I will vote for the man.
I understand the burning
need for an outsider. But you have to have someone with experience. Any old
outsider is not good enough. Please question yourselves; what makes you think
he is an “everyman”? Why do I see you folks talking about how he understands
you and your problems and how he is like you? He is the opposite of you. He has
never had to struggle, he has no idea what it’s like to decide between rent and
electricity. He only relates to you because he can be a bully and talk bad
about everyone else. Sorry to say that Trumpkins, but when was the last time
anyone in government made you
happy? You keep voting for the wrong party.
Trump will not make you
rich.
Trump will not make better
jobs.
Trump will not build a wall
and keep Mexicans out.
Trump will not bring jobs
back to the USA
Trump doesn’t give a damn
about you.
But what he will do is what
he has already begun to do. Widen the gap between the races, between the law
and the people, between you and the rich, between anyone another person hates
for no reason. He is divisive and antagonistic and enjoys the power he has over
you to make you bend to his will. Do not believe me? Then at his rallies, when
he mentions doing violence to dissenters does it happen? You are his puppets and you do not even see
it. Snake oil my friends.
He is a liar. He is a con
artist. He is conning you right now. He is a narcissist who buys his wives from
a catalog and lusts openly after his daughter.
So please tell me, honestly,
I want to know, what, in great detail, makes you think he has the brains for
this job? Business acumen is not a measurement of intelligence, if he has a
successful business at all. I need a tax return, a financial statement and a
look at why he went bankrupt all those times to buy into him being a good
businessman. And YOU should demand the same thing! You act like obedient
children or his employees. He is trying to win YOUR vote, but you act as if you
are desperate for his approval. Stop it! Be the American you so want to be!
What makes you think he has
the temperament to be the leader of the free world? This is not a game. This is
not The Apprentice. This is a volatile personality ?? (codes?)with his hand on
the codes.
Why do see morality in a man
who talks of bringing back jobs from overseas but has all his clothes made in
Mexico? A man who has openly sexually harassed his own daughter? A man who
thinks not paying hard working laborers is a good business decision (hey, it
was only a handshake agreement).
Clinton is not perfect. But
she is not any less perfect than other presidents we have had and she has a
record of a lifetime of service. David Duke (the king of the KKK) supports
Trump. The 9-11 Responders support Clinton. That right there speaks volumes.
The remainder of this blog
is an excerpt from an article from A PLUS by Isaac Saul. You can read more at A
PLUS, A Grain of Saul. I chose this because it sums up many other resource
materials, so please do not accuse me of using just one source - this
information is public and, in many circles is common knowledge.
Let’s start with a
simple but important position: Hillary Clinton is the most qualified person to
ever run for president.
Measuring
qualifications, of course, is somewhat subjective. She’s never served in the
military and never run her own business, something previous candidates have
done. But she was a secretary of state for four years, a U.S. senator for eight
years, a first lady who lived in the White House, saw the challenges of being
president up close and personal for eight years, a first lady of Arkansas, and
a law professor to boot. If she were elected, she’d be the first former cabinet
member to become president in almost 100 years.
Just months before
9/11, Hillary Clinton became a U.S. senator in New York. She served for eight
years in the city and was a key architect of the $21
billion federal aid bill that helped rebuild the city after her term started with the
worst tragedy New York had ever seen. But perhaps what she is most remembered
for is fighting for the health bill that served first responders in the first
48 hours after the attack. While Donald Trump bragged about his building now being the tallest in
New York City, Clinton was fighting
the Environmental Protection Agency to admit the air wasn’t safe to breathe.
That’s why Clinton has the support of so
many 9/11 first responders and survivors: they remember her work as a senator of New
York.
But guess what? Google
“Clinton health bill 9/11” and you’ll find nothing but results about her nearly
fainting outside a 9/11 memorial service, one she attended while diagnosed with
pneumonia.
That wasn’t the first
time Clinton had advocated for a strong health care bill, though. In 1994, a
universal health care bill that Hillary Clinton pushed for had failed as the
Clinton administration came into office. Then Democrats lost the House and then
lost the Senate for the first time in 40 years. Democrats had essentially given
up on health care reform, until First Lady Clinton helped the State
Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). She’s largely credited with getting the bill
into law, and it became the largest expansion of taxpayer-funded health
insurance in three decades.
[Hillary] Clinton has
traveled the world advocating a better life for women in places where that
concept wasn’t even on the radar.
Today, the bill has
resounding bi-partisan support, and 8.4 million children — many of them low-income — are enrolled in
its program.
As she mentioned in
the debate, her time as secretary of state required everything from traveling
to 112 countries and debating peace deals and ceasefires, to negotiating the
release of dissidents — men and women who pushed back against authoritarian
regimes. What she didn’t mention was just how real that “stamina” was: She set
records for travel as secretary of state.
But during Clinton’s
time as secretary, she also advocated a powerful, important worldview: that the
United States could be a force of good and progressivism across the world,
advocating for human rights, development, and equality in nations that may not
know any of those things. She pushed for investment and accommodation with
Asian powers such as China, who she knows we can share mutual goals with like
preventing war in the Asian Pacific and spurring economic growth by investing
in the future of technology.
In the beginning of
her term as secretary of state, Clinton had to win over President Barack Obama — something that, at the time, was not
guaranteed. They had a heated primary battle and many thought they may never
mend those wounds. But today, Obama is one of her biggest advocates. Despite
publicly disagreeing with her at times, most notably on the specifics of Syrian
intervention, he’s come to trust her counsel and had her present for some of
their biggest moments in the situation room, such as when she helped him
coordinate the assassination of Osama bin Laden.
Perhaps Clinton’s
greatest blemish on her record is the destabilizing of Libya, which led to the
Benghazi diplomatic compound attack. Certainly, it was one of the career bullet
points that made me despise her. But despite $7 million dollars spent on Benghazi investigations, 1,982 published
pages of reports on Benghazi, 10 congressional committees participating in
investigations, 3,194 questions asked in a public forum, Clinton and her
administration have been found guilty of zero wrongdoing. No “stand down” call
was ever found, one of the cornerstones of the Republican claims. The family of
Chris Stevens — the ambassador who became the face of the Benghazi tragedy
after he was killed in the siege — has publicly objected
to blaming Clinton for Benghazi.
Even more lost in the
Benghazi witch hunt is a simple reality: during George W. Bush’s presidency, there were 13 attacks
on U.S. embassies that killed 60 people. Yet his career and record were not marred by
these. Despite that, Trump and his campaign still thought it should have been
brought up in last night’s debate.
Throughout her time in
public service, Hillary Clinton has negotiated ceasefires
in Israel, put the Lilly Ledbetter Pay
Equity Act into law,
authored the Pediatric Research
Equity Act (which helped re-label
drugs to keep millions of children safe), and she got the EU, Russia, China and
other world powers to participate in the crippling sanctions on Iran that
forced the country to negotiate its nuclear plan out of existence. All while
enduring propaganda that thrust Benghazi and the Clinton Foundation — from
which there’s also been no evidence of wrongdoing, in fact, quite the
contrary — into the public’s
mind.
And throughout all that
time, Clinton has traveled the world advocating a better life for women in
places where that concept wasn’t even on the radar. She’s pushed for paternity
leave here in the United States, and became a symbol of women’s rights and
women’s progress everywhere. Looking at Secretary Clinton and reading about her
accomplishments, it’s tough to think that it was just 100 years ago the U.S.
elected the first woman to Congress. That 100 years later, she’s our first
female candidate for president to win a primary.
Secretary Clinton, I’m
sorry. ... You have accomplished far more in your life as a public servant than
just about anyone that’s run for this office...
And what does she get
for all of this work? As the debate wrapped up on Monday night, Clinton endured
Trump’s threats to mention her husband’s adultery despite the fact he’s had three
marriages, and been accused of rapeand is a known adulterer. As she eviscerated
him on calling women pigs and dogs, Trump lied about his
position on the Iraq War, lied about his reasons for not
releasing his tax returns, lied about his belief that climate change is a hoaxcreated by the Chinese, lied about his feeling that pregnancy is an “inconvenience” for businesses, lied during his defense of unconstitutional
stop and frisk, lied that crime is
getting worse in New York, and then lied when he said his temperament was his
greatest quality. And what did Clinton get?
On Fox News, they cut
to their political analyst Brit Hume describing Clinton: “The TV audience saw
the faces of the two candidates,” Hume said. “And she looked composed, smug
sometimes ... not necessarily attractive.”