Friday, April 11, 2014

PC in DC


When I grew up a couple (ahem) decades ago in the Washington, D.C. suburbs, Billy Kilmer was the quarterback for the Redskins, we actually won a game or two, and I have fond memories of, the gods forgive me, my father in a construction paper head dress doing an "Indian dance" in front of the TV, all of us singing "Hail to the Redskins". Now if you think the NAME is bad, look at the lyrics to the fight song and picture that scene.
I was not put on this earth to make friends and I have done a damn good job of doing just that, and my blog is here for me to voice opinions as I wish, repercussions be damned (you also cannot strike me through the computer). Anyone who knows me knows I despise political correctness, which differs from polite, empathetic speech.  I think, in its extreme, it is simply a form of social control. The extent to which I am politically correct goes no further than common sense. After all, I am a blond female who is 10 pounds overweight and 10 years over 40, so I am no stranger to jokes and names that can be hurtful without the name callers realizing it. I have no idea how women got left out of the PC file but that is another blog.
We all complain about our parents, but one thing mine did really really right was never to limit me to girly things.  If I wanted a Matchbox car for my collection I got it as readily as I got an Easy Bake oven (and if you do not know what those are they are now on display at the Smithsonian, I kid you not).  Climb a tree or play hop scotch, I did it all without a second thought as to whether or not it was" proper" for a girl to do. So the day the boy down the street took my Matchbox car and told me I couldn't play with it because I was a girl shocked me out of my penny loafers (did  I forget to add tall skinny dork to my self description?). I played baseball (not softball) and make-up with my sister. I sculpted clay Loch Ness Monsters and painted pictures with houses with white picket fences. I had no one telling me  "You cannot because you have no penis and you have a vagina".
Fast forward to high school, I outrun a couple boys in track...did not matter; out drink Mike Lusick, football team giant, still did not matter. I would always be a girl and therefore a lesser human. I could egotistically tell you my IQ is probably higher than yours, but it wouldn't matter because I am a GIRL.
So after being brought up at the cusp of the "go to college to get a husband" and "go to college so you do not need to get a husband" years, women were demanding equal pay yet still calling themselves "gals". It was a very confusing time for our gender.Being of the Gen X crowd, that is, the ones of us who are technically baby boomers but were born when the Beatles hit our shores and 20 years after WWII ended, we really had no good role models; man hating mothers or man-serving grandmothers.
So you have a generation of women who have married, had kids, and worked for pennies on the buck to a man's salary.  Then came the Women's Movement, and Equal Rights Movement, so finally everyone was finally realizing this inequality should stop. But it never did for women. We still are called spoiled sports if we take offense to a blond joke, a PMS joke, or anything said at our expense. We are chastised  if we do not react with our best Geisha smile. 
Coming from this perspective, and having lived the last 15 years or so with political correctness gone to the extreme in some cases, I find so much if this nothing but controlling. I honestly do not know what to call a person  of African heritage anymore. Some are now taking offense at African American. So I say black and I say white. Tough. You are not an African American any more than I am an Italian-Irish-English-Spanish American, yea how fun is THAT to say. You and I are Americans(unless you were not born here). But really we are not. We are INVADERS. Native Americans are the one and only TRUE Americans (a country misnamed in the first place) and should be the only ones with the rights to that name. But in the real world that is PC gone amuck.  How about human, wouldn't that be nice for a change? Ah, but I dream again.
So what about these here Redskins in D.C.?  I spend the majority of my life there and every bloody season the Washington Post did and does a piece on how the name should be changed. It has been an issue there for at least 30 years, but the rest of the nation did not hear of it since it was a local issue. Never got changed. Old Jack Kent Cooke did not give a damn about anyone and would not change the name of his team. But the one thing I always found interesting, and I am sure there are old Washington Post articles to back this up, was that none of the Native American organizations took a stand on the issue.They honestly did not seem to care. The only thing I recall, because it was so on the mark, was a Post article that argued the name of a sports team was so beneath the real issues they were having that they would not even recognize it as an issue at all,  it was so inconsequential. Now in D.C. There are not a lot of Native Americans and the ones there are revered as god-like and almost always get laid whenever they want. (It's that hair/eye combo dude). Sure you heard whispers of "reservations" but everyone was told if they wanted off, hey, there were no fences.  It has not been, until relatively recently, that the true plight of the Native American has come to my attention. It  is a disgrace to this government and hopefully we are looked down upon for it by the rest of the world.
But do we change the team's name? No. And I will give you my screwed up logic on this one.
Anyone who knows football knows Redskins fans are some of the most rabid fans around. The tickets are sold decades in advance. They can lose for years and the fans still love them.  So if the name is changed it is not going to do the Native American cause much good.  It's not right, it's not fair, but it's true. These fans will be angry at Native Americans for taking their team name away and look upon them as yet another controlling PC group. So when the votes are counted, the plate passed or the petition signed they will remember who took away their Redskins. I KNOW THESE PEOPLE, they will. Not nice but true. Personally, I believe it is more a backlash against the PC movement than Native Americans but the results are the same.
Another argument, why not the Cleveland Indians(or Browns, same same), the Knicks (derogatory towards knickerbockers, or Germans), the Braves, The Celtics. The Washington Bullets* changed names, with a really bizarre ending, and the Carthage College Redmen were kind enough to change it to Red Men. Here is a link, see for yourself how many team names are quite offensive. 
This is where I get into a lot of trouble. Toughen up! You think being called a "tall drink of water" or "do-able" or "dumb but darling" has been easy?  If you are a man I bet your boss never requested you not wear panties to work one day. You think walking streets in fear for our safety, all 51% of the population of us, all of our lives, is easy? We look over our shoulders all the time. We endure cat calls and are called "dykes" if we protest, like it's some kind of compliment. We smile to keep our jobs when our asses are pinched, yes even now, because it is still a white male world and we still do lose jobs, sexual harassment laws  be damned. Yet even white males on TV are portrayed now as dumb and run by their genitals, blacks are stereotyping themselves, as are Latinos and every Native American you see is wise and spiritual. Not a bad thing but still a stereotype. I personally would not want to have to live up to that high a standard because of my genetics. PC is crap. It's nothing but speech control, sanctioned judgment, and though it is not as rampant as it once was,  it's there. To be clear, PC to me means that I have to call you by the name you choose and when you change that choice I must use the new name. In other words, if I do not use the words and think the thoughts you choose for me then I am a bigot. That is PC to me.
So here is the thing. I do not complain that the women who read the news on TV have zero qualifications, can barely speak properly and obviously have the job because they are completely plastic and easy on a man's eye. I complain at the quality of tripe coming out of their painted mouths. THAT is an issue worth fighting for. I do not complain that Obama is half black and half white (which I do not care but this is for the sake of argument) I care that he has drones pointed at my ass and GitMo is still operational, THOSE are issues. I do not care that the Redskins are called The Redskins, look at the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, if that is not a self-image killer for women I don't know what is. I am more concerned that in the Southwestern US you can be a Native American and be turned down for a job because of it and no one will do a god damn thing. From what I hear from friends out there, native Americans are treated very closely to how Blacks were treated in the 1950s. THAT people is the issue! Pick your battles. If people think your biggest problem is that a sports team is named after you then you are defeating yourselves. They will tell themselves you have no fences around your land to keep you in, they will tell you you are an independent nation so pay no taxes, they will say you are filthy rich from your casinos...yes, they say it, I hear it, it's disgusting and hateful and ignorant but if the only time we hear your voices as one people is to change a football team's name then what else will these idiots think?
And if we allow the media, politicians and the speech police to take up our time and energy on these non-issues we never get the chance to challenge them on the things that are important and THAT bothers me. A little sleight of hand on their part.
So there you are. Call me a racist. call me a bigot. I feel I am neither, I am just trying to pull the wool off our eyes so that we are not sidetracked away from what is really important here.
And the reality is, if you want Washington D.C. to pass ANY legislation helping the unfair treatment of our true citizens, the Nations we somehow feel we "own", then you better let them call their little ball club what they want. It's just a game and a way to sell beer anyway.

*This is a darkly amusing story to me. The Wizards, Washington D.C.s Pro Basketball Team, used to be The Bullets, but they changed the name because the black community felt that since, at that time, DC had the highest number of shootings in the nation, Bullets was inappropriate. So the Washington Post did a write-in campaign asking readers to submit their ideas for a new name. At the end there were five: Wizards, Dragons, Express ,Stallions or Sea Dogs. I voted for Sea Dogs. When Wizards won I think I laughed at their stupidity for days. Wizards. Really. For a mostly black city. Wizards as in the Big Guy in the KKK is called the Wizard. Great change there guys.



Friday, March 07, 2014

Ya Can't Fight Crazy With Crazy

To try to convey all my thoughts and feelings on what has happened to the Republican Party over the last decade would be an entire book in and of itself. The highlights are such; for some reason the elected Republicans and their media shills became lying, paranoid infants when Obama took office, having felt unlimited power at their fingertips prior to that via the misnomer, The Patriot Act.
I know many Republican  citizens who have no place. They are not Democrats but they do not even recognize their own party
anymore. The Republicans will say and do anything to hurt the administration, even when they get caught in lies, self contradictions and pick-and-chose quoting. This is not the way of our Joe Citizen Republican.
Last night was the end for me though. Prior to yesterday this was just a huge annoyance bordering on the frightening. It seemed The Republican party was cutting of our noses to spite Obama's face. What I saw last night was chilling.
I was watching The Daily Show With Jon Stewart. The bit he was doing was illustrating how far the Republicans have gone over to the insanity side. Regardless of what you think of him or his show, the quotes and clips were real and full, not snippets out of context.
The Republicans were praising Putin. Calling him Ronald Regan. Showing a photo of him riding a horse with no shirt on along with  his typical dead eyed scowl. Then in comparison  they showed Obama riding a bike and repeatedly insulted his wardrobe, somehow implying that the fact that he rides a bike and wears "mom jeans" makes him less of a president and that we should idolize Putin for being a "man's man" by ring a horse with no shirt on. I think one of them even used the phrase "muscles bulging". At this point I got confused. Were they casting for a western or talking about the effectiveness of a leader? They said Putin was a better leader than Obama.  Below is a quote from yesterday's paper giving a brief synopsis of all of this:
Stewart saved the best for last during the segment. After showing all of these conservatives calling Obama weak and indecisive while fawning over Putin and basically wishing he was their leader, Stewart showed clips of many of those same people complaining that Obama acts like a dictator and rules America with an iron fist. Apparently, in the conservative mind, Obama is a 'weak, mom-jeans wearing DICTATOR KING!' As Stewart hilariously highlighted, either something happened to these people as children to create this inherent cognitive dissonance, or they will just do whatever it takes to undermine the President at every turn.
Putin is well known for using his media as a propaganda machine to build himself up and American conservatives have swallowed it. When they said we needed a leader like him who "hunts bears" what they were referring to was a photo of him having hunted and killed a tiger. Which actually he did not. The tiger was trapped and tranquilized and had to lay there and wait for Putin to arrive so he could shoot him. Yes. Remind you of anyone Sarah Palin?
It is no secret Putin pines for the old USSR days. Yet the Republican praised him for how "when he speaks everyone reacts immediately" yet they forgot the "for fear of their lives" part. Putin is an old fashioned dictator and it is obvious to anyone, except the Republicans, who for some reason cannot stand Obama. I have my personal thoughts on why that is and I am going to keep them that way.
After all of this information overload (and I highly recommend you watch the 5 minute segment on youtube.com: http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-march-6-2014/big-vladdy---semi-delusional-autocrats )
To me this five minutes sums up everything that has gone wrong with the Republican party.
Having said all of that, Today I received mail from the Republican Senate Leadership Survey. I have seen enough of these to know this is a real one. Basically, a survey from the Senate on how you think the leadership of this nation is doing and what they should or should not do  in teh future, with the pretense your opinion matters. Now this is important. It gives our Senate an idea of what We The People want. We all know that surveys are only as meaningful as their method of question forming, so listen to the questions this survey asked. Now remember, this is a United States political party. One that prides itself on being fair, conservative and patriotic. Italics are my ideas. Words in quotations were put there by them.
Real questions:
·         What is important? Blocking efforts to pass another wasteful "stimulus" plan?(well the second great depression did not happen and everyone has paid back the money so "wasteful is hardly an appropriate word here )
·         Do you believe raising taxes has had a positive effect on our fragile economy?(loaded question, "fragile" implying a yes answer is the only right one)
·         Do you believe President Obama's strategy of treating all other countries as equals to the United States has strengthened our security and weakened the resolve of those who seek to do our nation harm?(Conjecture, opinion and projection, all traditional propaganda tactics)
·         Do you support a constitutional amendment to protect traditional marriage between a man and a woman?(by traditional does that mean the bride has to wear white and everyone must dance to YMCA at the reception?)
·         Is it the responsibility of Republicans in the Senate to hold President Obama accountable for the actions  of his administration in Benghazi, the IRS Scandal, wire tapping journalists...? (Benghazi was an attack on us, this "scandal" was politics as usual, and the only wire tapping I know of is by the government, sanctioned through the Republicans sacred cow The Patriot Act)
·         Do you believe ObamaCare is a total disaster that must be repealed?(yes, lets repeal something we have not fully implemented yet based on the projection of unqualified
Republicans who have proven they will do anything to block Obama's success)

The list goes on and on, but some especially non-biased phrases include:

·         Republicans do best...promoting a strong, proud America (because only Republicans want that)

·         ...liberal special interest handouts...(as opposed to conservative's protection of the top 1%ers)

·         ...Congress need to listen more closely to grass roots Republicans on such issues as spending, ethics
·         and immigration reform...(why is ethic in with spending and immigration reform? This implies spending and immigrants are unethical)

·         ...dramatic Obama-Democrat drive to initiate European-style socialism in America...(I have no idea what they are even basing this on except possibly delusional paranoia. And if they do not like socialism lets first get rid of their social security and Medicare, two highly socialist programs)

I have a few problems with this.

First, and most obvious, is that this is so slanted it is useless as a true gauge of people's wants, and if I ever hear the results of this crap quoted to back up one of their Fox News idiots rants I will put a fist through my TV. The "IRS SCANDAL"? You mean when the Democrats were accused of targeting republicans for IRS audits? Because I am sure that was a vital and nationally destructive "scandal"( that lasted 3 days in the news) and was never perpetrated by the Republicans.
I love "liberal special interest handouts" even though the Republican equivalent to that is "special interest kickbacks".

Believe me I barely scratched the surface of this piece of propaganda.

What frightens me is that many people do not think for themselves. They simply follow party lines blindly and never question sources or motives so things like this, worded in this way, paint a disastrous and probably frightening picture of the Democrats while making the republicans look like, direct quote here, "strong, proud Americans" like only THEY want that?

People, no, fellow citizens, this has gone way past cat fighting and politics as usual. This "no Obama at any cost" has hurt our country. We have been successful as a 2 party nation because, though our party methods differ, our goal has always been the same...America first. Historically, on the good days, the 2 parties hash things out, both trying to win their side, concluding somewhere in the middle or possible leaning a bit to one side, but in the end, something good for America.

Not anymore. Republicans first showed disrespect for the office of the President. If you are worried about looking weak to other nations, then the last thing you want to do is belittle and embarrass your leader. Then they decided that not only was their way always the only right way, but they promoted the smallest, most extreme faction of their party, the Tea Party, and managed to alienate everyone but their own  tiny group. Even long time Republican elected officials are switching parties or going independent because they no longer can be affiliated with the fantasy world that is the "grass roots of America". Finally, they are so desperate now that they will vote down their own bills if it means making Obama look bad. Their policies, or rather their lack of policies and their refusal to negotiate have created a bad America, and yet they insist this America is all the administrations' fault.

I hear them clamoring of impeachment and incarceration but if you look at the facts, look at the stats, you will see the worst terrorism we have had in the past decade has been the Republican party, the ones who deserve the scrutiny and incarceration.


Lets wake up people. Stop believing the scare mongers and start thinking for yourselves again. If you don't, then doing so may not even be an option in the future.