A 51-48 vote Thursday killed a Republican effort to let both employers and insurance companies deny coverage for contraceptives and other items they object to on religious or moral grounds. In doing so, the Senate upheld Obama's policy, which guarantees women access to coverage for contraceptives through an employer's health plan or directly from an insurance company.
If it had passed, the amendment would have allowed insurance companies and employers to refuse to pay "if the coverage would be contrary to the religious beliefs or moral convictions of the issuer, or other entity offering the plan". Considering that health insurance is part of an employee's pay package, it would have been very disturbing to be paid only what your employer felt abided by his personal set of morals.
This issue illustrates a frightening trend in America, the assumption that if you are not a Protestant Christian you are not a decent person, a family person, or a "good American", whatever the proper definition of that is. And if you are an agnostic or atheist you are both vilified and prayed for.
Senator Scott Brown has called the issue "one of our most fundamental rights as a people - the freedom of religion," adding: "No one should be forced by government to do something that violates the teachings of their faith." (we are not putting you in the stockades, we are asking for the pill).
"The Blunt amendment would allow employers to deny virtually any preventive or essential health service based on a religious or moral objection," Senator Jeanne Shaheen said. "An employer could deny coverage of HIV/AIDS screenings, prenatal care for single mothers, mammograms, vaccinations for children, or even screenings for diabetes based on a moral objection to a perceived unhealthy lifestyle."
Hm. I did not realize my work benefits and fair compensation were a moral issue, or that freedom to practice religion included depriving me if my rights as a citizen. This frightens me. As these conservative Christians are claiming to be protecting their freedom of religion (which is conveniently subjective), I find my basic freedoms being threatened, and not just regarding this amendment (which never uses the word "contraceptive"). One feels that if you are not part of a "traditional" family unit, if you are not "God fearing" or if you do not abide by the social and moral standards of the 12th century you are somehow a bad person, a dangerous person, with your liberal, socialist ideas. God is now the new excuse for controlling others, for justification of claims of being superior humans and citizens, and for being intolerant of anyone or anything you do not agree with.
I see old prejudices coming back into vogue and being embraced as positive things, moral ideas, God inspired beliefs. Homosexuals, unmarried couples (of either same or opposite sex), single parents, indeed, college students pole dancing for tuition, Wiccans (which is also a religion I might point out) are all back on the whipping post because "our American way of life is being threatened by these non-conformists and if you do not let me protect myself by allowing me to be judge and jury you are depriving me of my religious freedom and that will lead to the downfall of America". This is dangerous stuff people, this is a get-out-of-jail-free card for witch hunters. Do what you want and include "God" in it and you are untouchable.
Another joke is the newest reality show called The Republican Debates. They are nothing more than an "I am more Christian than you" contest and if you do not believe me, write a transcript of any one of them, but leave out any mention of religion, God or "traditional values". You will have even less substance than you do with these ideas. And these supposedly intelligent, educated old white males (sigh, once again) are going to convince us with a few references to the Bible that they are competent to lead this vast and complex nation?
These Christians (who are anything but in my book) act as if they are being persecuted at every turn, that they are the misunderstood guys in the white hats that will be fed to the lions at any moment and that you must band together with them to protect all our rights as religious people, when the truth is it is the non-Christians who are in danger of losing freedoms. They have been labeled sinners and anti-American and told that, despite recent studies, traditional families are the ONLY acceptable ones and if you are not part of that well your healthcare needs to be limited. (Children who grew up in single parent households are better adjusted and more successful than ones who grew up in "traditional" two parent households where the parents were together only for the sake of the children. Further, newer studies are showing that same sex partners raise MORE mentally stable kids than households with parents of the opposite sex who are not happy).
So please, let's start talking about issues that matter and leave God out of it because frankly, as soon as you get all religious on me you lose all credibility. If I do not believe in your Bible, in your faith, than you may as well be arguing for the existence of unicorns. You sound ignorant, bigoted, narrow-minded and basically intellectually lazy to me, when you probably are non of those things. Just leave it for Sundays and for those of you who chose to drink the Kool-Aid.
(please note, religion and Christianity are different than spirituality and you do not have to be Christan to believe in a God-being.)
1 comment:
I more than agree that our counry is fearfully heading toward a crisis of a very different kind. Not a war or a rebellion, but an "I am better than you since I believe in God" crisis. This morally superior attitude is not only being used as verbal hatchet in an attempt to chip away at the freedoms of "non-believers", but,as you point out, those subscribing to the "I am better" belief had the audacity to take their ideals to a higher and more public venue by introducing legislation that virtually disallows certain described actions deemed by this group of zeslots (in the worst sense of the word)as an unlawful action. It is only a matter of time before more drastic laws are enacted, at which time we will have reverted to the middle-ages life wherein the decisions of the monarchies were heavily influenced by the church. Isn't this why our forefathers came to this country to release themselves from religious slavery? Isn't this why our Constitution's Bill of Rights stresses religious freedom without putting any restrictions on that freedom?
One wonders how many more freedoms will be compromised under the guise of religion, the peoples' right to know, the greater good, national security, ad nauseum.
Post a Comment